Sunday, March 8, 2015

Identity Paper

            The cultural topic I chose to write about is gender stereotypes in grade school-aged children. My goal was to figure out if gender stereotypes have been instilled in us since childhood or if they are something that have developed as we have gotten older. There are many different factors that can affect these gender stereotypes such as the region you grew up in, who you were friends with, and who your parents and family members are. I believe that the people around you can have an extremely strong influence on what gender stereotypes end up affecting you.

            Growing up with three older brothers, there weren't many so-called "girly" things like dolls and makeup kits, lying around my house. It was all sports equipment here and action figures there. I guess you could say I was pretty much your stereotypical boy. Was it because I did grow up with three older brothers, so their likes and interest just sort of grew on me? If that’s true, why did my first-born brothers, who were twins, end up liking all this stereotypical boy stuff? Was it what my parents bought for them? Was it what society geared them to like? There are a multitude of different reasons for why my brothers and I began to like certain things and dislike others, but a big part of it is probably because of gender stereotypes that have been ingrained in us since we were little kids.  It is stated in Sex Roles in the section Accessibility of Gender Stereotype Domains: Developmental and Gender Differences in Children, “From birth, children are surrounded by information that communicates the beliefs and behaviors that are considered appropriated for each gender group. It is, therefore, not surprising that they amass a fair amount of gender stereotype knowledge early in life” (Miller 870).

            Girls liking pink and boys liking blue is one of the most basic gender stereotypes. Usually if parents are expecting a girl, everything they buy is going to be pink, and if it’s a boy, everything’s going to be blue. In a study done with American children who were aged from 2 to 5 years old, they were shown toys in a catalogue and were asked to identify whether it was for boys or for girls. Adults had identified the toys as masculine, feminine, neutral, or ambiguous previously. When identify the neutral or ambiguous toys as gender specific, none of the boys or girls differed in the fact that they identified it that way because of its color, “suggesting that even at this young age, both male and female children clearly associate color and gender” (Karniol 120). 98 Israeli preschoolers and third graders were examined as they colored in their coloring books. More colors in general were used for figures stereotypically associated with one’s own gender. Boys avoided coloring the figures more associated with girls and using the color pink entirely, while girls used fewer female stereotyped colors for the male figures, but used both types of colors equally for the other figures.

“The rigidity of boys’ gender stereotypes may partially reflect the greater restrictiveness of parents with respect to gender counter-stereotypic behavior in boys than in girls. Thus, American parents hold more rigid stereotypes of males and exert greater pressure towards conformity to gender-stereotyped behavior in boys” (Karniol 121). Parents in America have actively prevented their sons from liking what they considered to be “girly” things, such as the color pink, with one parent saying, “He likes pink and I try not to encourage him to like pink just because, you know, he’s not a girl” (Karniol 121).

“Findings on gender differences in self-perceived gender typicality have been somewhat mixed. Some studies have found higher levels of self-perceived gender typicality among boys than girls… Researchers have posited that the observed higher levels of gender typicality among boys may be due to greater pressure for gender conformity among boys…” (Patterson 423). I’m inclined to agree with the researchers who believe there’s higher gender typicality in boys because of societal pressure. If you wear a pink shirt or read something like the Twilight series, you’re automatically labeled gay. Society forces boys into these rigid stereotypes like “you must like sports” and “you can’t cry” in order to be “manly.” Boys can only like “boy” stuff, while on the other hand, girls can like “girl” stuff and “boy” stuff and nobody seems to care. Everyone should be able to enjoy whatever they like, regardless of gender, without being labeled.

I conducted a short experiment and interview with my 6-year-old niece to see if and how she has been affected by gender stereotypes in her life so far. The experiment is loosely based on the study done with the 2 to 5 year old American children with the toy catalogue. Like the adults who had decided on which gender the items were targeted towards before they conducted the study, I did the same with what items I presented to my niece. The experiment differed in the fact that while the boys and girls were just identifying whether the toy was for boys or girls, my niece was choosing which she preferred out of the choices. While they boys and girls who were surveyed in the study usually relied on color as their main identifier on which gender the toys targeted, my niece differed in that fact in that color had no influence on her decisions, but on what she personally enjoyed more. My niece has one younger sister and no brothers, but the ratio of the number of uncles to aunts is 5 to 1. The questions usually revolved around choosing between two stereotypically gender specific items, whether it be a toy, game, or book. The first question I asked her was whether she would like to read a Batman comic (the stereotypically male item) or a Cinderella book (the stereotypically female item), to which she responded, “Batman” (Greenwood). I followed up with why she chose Batman over Cinderella and she said because it’s superheroes, to which she prefers over princesses. She chose the opposite of what her gender would stereotypically choose, which might surprise some, but knowing she’s growing up with a dad and three uncles who like Batman, her choice would be seemingly obvious. I then asked her to choose between a My Little Pony DVD and a Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles DVD. She chose the My Little Pony DVD because “[she] watches it a lot and like it better” (Greenwood). A Spider-Man action figure versus Rarity, a My Little Pony, was next up and she said, “Rarity because she’s pretty” (Greenwood). I also gave her the choice between Candy Land and Joker’s Funhouse with her choosing Joker’s Funhouse because you’re able to shoot down the Joker with Batman’s batarang and use Superman’s x-ray vision. I then gave her My Little Pony and Batman. After a few seconds of thinking, she said, “It’s too hard to decide because they’re both my favorite things” (Greenwood). My final question was if she ever got picked on or made fun of at school because she liked things girls don’t usually like and she said no because her friends, both boys and girls, like the same things she does.

My niece’s answers and choices were greatly affected by her surroundings while growing up. Had she grown up with more aunts than uncles, and those aunts loved the Disney Princesses, I’m sure her choices would be radically different. It helps strengthen my belief that the people around you have a strong influence on what gender stereotypes do affect you as you age.

Works Cited

Karniol, Rachel. Sex Roles: The Color of Children’s Gender Stereotypes. New York: Springer Science & Business Media, 2011. Print.

Miller, Cindy Faith; Lurye, Leah E; Zosuls, Kristina M; Ruble, Diane N. Sex Roles: Accessibility of Gender Stereotype Domains: Developmental and Gender Differences in Children. New York: Springer Science & Business Media, 2009. Print.

Patterson, Meagan M. Sex Roles: Self-Perceived Gender Typicality, Gender-Typed Attributes, and Gender Stereotype Endorsement in Elementary-School-Aged Children. New York: Springer Science & Business Media, 2012. Print.


Greenwood, Alexis. Personal interview. January 2015.

Read/Response

Week 5
Stereotypes are the main topic of my essay, but unlike these two essays which focus on the stereotypes of race, my essay focuses on the stereotypes of gender. That doesn't mean that these two essays aren't valid when it comes to evaluating my essay because they are. Gender stereotypes may differ across races. Briefly in my own essay, I discuss a study done with about a hundred Israeli grade school students, both boys and girls, studying their choices of colors. If the study had been done somewhere else, like the US, with a hundred American boys and girls in grade school, the results may differ from the Israeli boys and girls. I think one of the most important parts I could take away from the first essay is how it talks about how stereotypes make us feel. How it says we "adore stereotypes" and that we need them to either help identify ourselves or to disassociate ourselves from them.

Week 6
Part 1:
Just scrolling through the tabs, I can definitely see I've made some of these mistakes. I have vague pronoun reference in the very first paragraph of my draft. Two more mistakes I ran into while reading through my essay was the lack of subject-verb agreement and the lack of agreement between pronoun and antecedent. I also think I have some fused sentences here and there. Most of these problems are an easy fix, and I feel a bit dumb for making them. If I just focused a little more on what I was writing, all of these mistakes could have been avoided.

Part 2:
I think the video relates to our conversations in class about the process of research in that we have to view situations at different angles. We have to look at other perspectives in both life and in research. In class we talked a lot about stereotypes, and one of the ways we could look at stereotypes is in the shoes of the person that is being stereotyped. In the video, he spoke of getting out of our comfort zone, and putting ourselves in the shoes of a stereotyped person is doing that.

Week 7
Dilan,
The bulk of your essay doesn't actually start until the third paragraph, leaving the two before it almost useless. Almost everything said in the first two paragraphs can be cut, or at least shortened into one smaller intro paragraph. The interview was well done, so I wouldn't really changed much about it, but I feel you can focus a little bit more on your sources in the next paragraph. The quote you chose was nice, but I feel it can be expanded on. Maybe bring in another source with a similar message to help with that, or just expand on your explanation of that one quote.

Joe,
I think you have a similar problem as Dilan in that the essay really doesn't get started until about the interview with your father. If you shorten your opening so it gets to the point faster, I think your essay will be better off. About halfway through the third paragraph, the line, "To someone who doesn't get out in nature a lot, the quite, cold, snowy woods could be the last place in the world that you would want to be," I assume "the quite" is supposed to be "the quiet." A little bit father down from that when you are listing the misconceptions of hunters, instead of saying, "...hunters are cruel to animals, hunters spend taxpayer money, hunters are dangerous..." you should change it to, "...hunters are cruel to animals, spend taxpayer money, are dangerous..." to give the sentence a better flow.

Week 8
Karen Swallow Prior starts off by identifying the sources she encountered while conducting her research and is using to base her conclusion on. She doesn't just rattle off her sources in quick snippets, but she embeds them within her text and makes them flow with the rest of the article. The first two sources she writes about, the Gregory Currie and Annie Murphy Paul pieces, come to what seem to be conflicting conclusions, but Prior states, “Yet these essays aren't so much coming to different conclusions as considering different questions.” She chooses to take an unbiased approach from the beginning and consults both sides before making her decision on what she believes is the correct answer.

While I see what she was trying to do with the unbiased approach, I feel like she doesn’t give enough about her ideas and it’s hard to differentiate her views from the sources she was citing. I would prefer it if she were to state clearly and expand on her own ideas, rather than shove them between the multitude of sources she cites.


Compared to the Said piece we read through in class, I feel like both essays had their strengths and weaknesses. In the Said piece, it was easy to figure out what side he was on, while in the Prior piece it is much more unclear. On the other hand, Said used tough and confusing terms that were hard to get passed, while Prior’s writing is very simple, easily understandable, and more approachable.

Prompts

Week 5
/

You walk the hallways of the school before first period begins. It’s Friday and all the people around you are making plans for the weekend. You overhear a group of guys planning a football game, but one says that they can’t make it. “Why?” the group echoes each other. “I’m performing in the school musical all weekend.” The group erupts with laughter, “That’s so gay, man.” “Just skip it, fag.” “Only chicks sing in musicals.” You hear the insults even after being a few feet passed them. They stick in your mind.

/

The kindergarteners are all on the playground for recess. The boys are playing with their trucks, and the girls are playing with their dolls. One the girls leave the group playing with dolls to see what the boys are doing. She asks if she can play with the trucks, too. “Yeah, but you have to use the girl truck,” and hands her the small pink truck.

/

You broke your phone, so you’re waiting in line at the store to see if it can be fixed. The people in front of you consist of a mother and her teenage son.  The son’s getting a new iPhone, but they seem to be out of the black ones. “The white ones fine, mom.” “No it’s not. No son of mine will have the girly color!” You’re confused. Since when was white ever considered “girly?” The mother’s beginning to cause a scene as the clerk tries to calm her down to no avail. The mother and son storm out of the store with no new iPhone at all, all because the white one was too “girly.”

/

The boy’s excited for his first day of first grade, with his brand new Spider-Man backpack and My Little Pony lunch kit. By the time he got home he was completely devastated. All the boys wouldn’t eat lunch with him because of his lunch kit. They called him a girl and continued to make fun of him. The next day, the My Little Pony lunch kit was left at home and was replaced with a brown paper bag.

/

You and a few friends are kicking back and playing some video games. As you get to the character select screen, everyone starts scrambling to pick their characters. You end up picking one of the girl characters because that’s whom you play best with, while everyone else picks a guy character. “Dude, why are you picking the girl? There’re like 3 other guys that didn’t get picked.” “I like the girl. She’s easily my best character.” “Only girls pick girls, man. You’re going to get the crap beat out of you.” You were the target of endless ridicule, at least until the match was over, and you were declared victorious.

/

Week 6

Week 7

The experiment I conducted with my niece is loosely based on the study done with the 2 to 5 year old American children with the toy catalogue. Like the adults who had decided on which gender the items were targeted at before they conducted th study, I did the same with what items I presented to my niece. The experiment differed in the fact that while the boys and girls were just identifying whether the toy was for boys or girls, my niece was choosing which she preferred out of the choices. While they boys and girls who were surveyed in the study usually relied on color as their main identifier on which gender the toys targeted, my niece differed in that fact in that color had no influence on her decisions, but on what she personally enjoyed more.

Responses to Peers

Week 5
Ryan Morgan
I like how each of the five sections is related to one another in that they are all about being nervous, scared, and excited. I think the first of the five is the strongest of them all because you delve a little more into detail in that one. I feel like the others could easily be expanded on, but they work well for the most part seeing as they are in a sequence. You could probably get away with combing the second and third pieces into one and adding a completely new piece in to further get across your feelings on what is happening in that moment.

Ignacio De Socarraz Novoa
This piece is nicely written and it gets your point across well, but I think you could expand upon it a little bit more. Maybe one or two more of you experiences or possible a family members that they have told you about that has faced similar instances such as the ones you already have written about? I think what you have here is great, but it could be so much better if there was a little more to it.

Luke Willemse
Your work here really paints a nice picture for the reader. I also like how each piece is sequenced into the next, you arrive in Philly, you arrive on campus, you are in the gym, and finally, you are about to start your first game. It gives the piece a feeling of anticipation, and right before we are about to reach the climax of the story and the anticipation is rising even higher than before, it ends, which works well. The final few lines I feel are the strongest and really drive home this nervous energy in the locker room. The captain is getting everyone hyped up and while they are, they are still nervous as shown by the shaking legs and heard by the heart beats.

Daniel Mosley
I really like what you've got here, the second one especially. I think a lot of us can relate to that in some form or another. Being an artist, it always makes me question whether my work or I myself am good enough when something I post gets little to no response. You put your heart and soul into this one thing for some many hours, days, months, whatever, and to have maybe one or two likes on it hurts. It may strive some to do better and work even harder at first, but if you get no recognition piece after piece after piece, many lose their drive and just give up. I also really enjoy the last line in the first paragraph in the third one about the guy with the annoying laugh. The way you worded it is fantastic, I can almost hear his laugh just by reading that line.

Ian Barrett
This is obviously a very serious topic and close to your heart, and I believe you did it justice in your writing and in getting your point across, but I do agree with what Jason said. If you were to just change some words and rearrange some of your sentences, I think you could have made this piece all the more stronger. It would have been great if you used some of your experiences or your father's and told it in a narrative as I think it would help people who might not have your struggle relate to, or at least recognize, it a little more.

Week 6
Ryan Morgan
You are clearly able to tell what your essay was about just by viewing the collage of pictures you posted, the subject being public schools versus private schools. The public schools are the more modern looking buildings and the ones without the uniforms, while the private schools usually have older architecture and do have uniforms, which is shown in the pictures. Your collage also shows a dollar sign, signifying that private schools are usually quite expensive. The picture of the woman looking at the private/public sign also helps show that your essay is about the comparing and contrasting elements of the two different types of schools.

Parth Bharwad
I can tell with both of your quotes and the pictures you provided that your essay was about someone making a big life changing decision. The blending of the two flags displays that someone is moving from one country to another and basically starting over in America. In the two quotes you posted, the main theme of them is curiosity. I get the feeling that you think curiosity is an important trait to have as it can lead to you discovering new and interesting things that you never would have thought about before. If you're not curious, you'll be stuck in the same routine every single day with no variation for the rest of your life.

Ignacio De Socarraz Novoa
The poem you posted is extremely interesting and is able to be related to by a large majority of people. The poem makes it seem as if bi-cultural people are sort of stuck on the border between the places they represent, but don't exactly fit in either. These people are judged by both sides as different, as alien. The part that stuck out to me the most was, "an American to Mexicans, a Mexican to Americans," as it shows that these bi-cultural people are seen as outsiders, like they don't belong anywhere. They're stuck on the edge and just want to be accepted for who they are.

Donald Arnold
Right away I can tell that your identity is that of a biomedical engineer. The photos allow me to see some things you're studying to become and some things you strive to be. The guy hanging onto the green arrow that's flying upward shows that you aim to be successful in your future career, and the bookcase in the library displays all the research you must endure in order to be successful. The overall feeling I get from your collage is that you hope to become a biomedical engineer and help improve the lives of everyone you're able to with your work.

Dilan Kalaria
The thing that strikes me the most in this banner is the two words "Lead It," as I assume you want to be some sort of leader. I also get the sense that you have a lot of school spirit considering the picture is of the Philly skyline, is blue and gold, and has Drexel's slogan, "Live It." One of Drexel's goals is to help you become a leader, but Drexel also wants you to learn to work on an equal level as a team. The co-ops are able to get you the experience of working in a team, so you can learn what it takes to become a leader.

Week 7
Dilan Kalaria
This is a nice edition to your essay. You took my advice and brought in more information from other sources, which really adds to the paper. The two new quotes that you used work well and flow with the rest of the paragraph and the explanations help further the points they are making. The first sentence of the revision is also a good bridge between the two ideas and brings them together in a way that makes sense. Continue to add more things akin to this in your final essay, it will become an even more nicely written and informative piece.

Week 8
Dilan Kalaria

We seem to be in agreement on many things about the Prior and Said pieces, especially in your final paragraph. We both said that each essay had its strengths and weaknesses, and you covered that quite well by splitting each piece up into categories such as depth, structure, and tone. In your second paragraph, you state that you would have liked if Prior had expanded on her paragraph about learning to read in school, to which I'm inclined to agree. Ending her talk on that subject with a link to another piece she had written almost feels like a cop out. Maybe if she were to quote some important lines and sentences within the link and expand on them a bit, and then leave the link if people would like to further read her thoughts on the matter, she would be better off. I like how in your first paragraph when you quote Prior, you explain why you feel it was such an interesting part of her essay and how she backs it up with research and sources. Nice job on your analysis.